Showing posts with label strategies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label strategies. Show all posts
Saturday, 24 February 2018
Sunday, 17 December 2017
Key Concepts in Assessing Students
![]() |
| Credits: Muskegon Community College |
To what extent are my students achieving the stated goals?
How should I allocate class time for the current topic?
Can I teach this topic in a more efficient or effective way?
What parts of this unit are my students finding most valuable?
How will I change this unit the next time I teach it?
Which grades do I assign my students?
Meanwhile, for students, learner assessment answers a different set of questions:
Do I know what my teacher thinks is most important?
Am I mastering the unit content?
How can I improve the way I study English?
What grade am I earning in this subject?
Explaining the importance of assessment, Brissenden and Slater state that assessment is important because it drives students learning. Whether we like it or not, most students tend to focus their energies on the best or most expeditious way to pass their ‘tests.’ Based on this knowledge, we can use our assessment strategies to manipulate the kinds of learning that takes place. For example, assessment strategies that focus predominantly on recall of knowledge will likely promote superficial learning. On the other hand, if we choose assessment strategies that demand critical thinking or creative problem-solving, we are likely to realize a higher level of student performance or achievement. In addition, good assessment can help students become more effective self-directed learners.
As indicated above, motivating and directing learning is only one purpose of assessment. Well-designed assessment strategies also play a critical role in educational decision-making and are a vital component of ongoing quality improvement processes at the lesson, course and/or curriculum level.
To ensure our comprehension on assessment, here are some important concepts in assessment:
1. Formative and Summative Assessment
Formative assessment aims to inform ongoing teaching and learning by providing immediate feedback. A teacher who assesses pupils’ understanding of a listening text and uses the outcomes to change her plan and give more practice before moving on to a speaking activity, is carrying out formative assessment. Ideally, formative assessment should influence both teaching and learning by giving feedback to both teacher and learner. Summative assessment, on the other hand, aims to asses learning at the end of a unit, term, year, or course, and does not feed back into the next round of teaching.
2. Diagnostic and Achievement Assessment
Many assessment activities provide both formative and summative information, but it is helpful to be clear as to the primary purpose and one of an assessment because this can affect what kind of information the activity needs to produce. It is fundamental to highlight the distinction between assessing achievement, i.e. what a learner can do, and diagnostic assessment that aims to establish what a child can and can not yet do, so that further learning opportunities can be provided.
3. Criterion-referenced and Norm-referenced Assessment
If we assess learner’s achievement, we can produce a ranking of learners which says that child X has learnt more than child Y and less that child Z; this would be norm-referenced. Alternatively, we can compare a learner’s performance, not to other learners, but to a set of criteria of expected performance or learning targets. Criterion-referenced assesment can match the child’s performance against an expected response on an item, or it may make use of a set of descriptors along a scale, on which a learner is placed.
4. Validity
The concepts of validity and reliability are used to describe the technical quality of assessment practices. They are more often applied to testing, although are also important in alternative assessment. Validity is more important, particularly in alternative assessment, and concerns how far an assesment assesses what it claims to. If a test does not measure what it claims to, then there are clearly dangers in using it.
5. Reliability
Reliability measures how well a test or assessment assesses what it claims to: would the assessment produce the same results if it were taken by the same pupils on different occasions, or if the same test or assesment was scored by different people? (Gipps and Stobart, 1993).
Validity and reliability can be conflicting needs for assessment techniques and procedures. The most reliable assessments will be pencil and paper tests in which each item measures only a single aspect of a skill and which give each testee a numerical mark. But the most valid assessments will be on those that collect a lot of information about performance on several aspects of a skill. When validity increased, reliability decreased.
Types and Approaches to Assessment
Numerous terms are used to describe different types and approaches to learner assessment. Although somewhat arbitrary, it is useful to these various terms as representing dichotomous poles:
Formative <---------------------------------> Summative
Informal <---------------------------------> Formal
Continuous <----------------------------------> Final
Process <---------------------------------> Product
Divergent <---------------------------------> Convergent
1. Formative vs. Summative Assessment
Formative assessment is designed to assist the learning process by providing feedback to the learner, which can be used to identify strengths and weakness and hence improve future performance. Formative assessment is most appropriate where the results are to be used internally by those involved in the learning process.
Summative assessment is used primarily to make decisions for grading or determine readiness for progression. Typically summative assessment occurs at the end of an educational activity and is designed to judge the learner’s overall performance.
2. Informal vs. Formal Assessment
With informal assessment, the judgments are integrated with other tasks, e.g., lecturer feedback on the answer to a question. Informal assessment is most often used to provide formative feedback. As such, it tends to be less threatening and thus less stressful to the student. However, informal feedback is prone to high subjectivity or bias.
Formal assessment occurs when students are aware that the task that they are doing is for assessment purposes, e.g., a written examination. Most formal assessments also are summative in nature and thus tend to have greater motivation impact and are associated with increased stress. Given their role in decision-making, formal assessments should be held to higher standards of reliability and validity than informal assessments.
3. Continuous vs. Final Assessment
Continuous assessment occurs throughout a learning experience (intermittent is probably a more realistic term). Continuous assessment is most appropriate when student and/or instructor knowledge of progress or achievement is needed to determine the subsequent progression or sequence of activities. Continuous assessment provides both students and teachers with the information needed to improve teaching and learning in process. Obviously, continuous assessment involves increased effort for both teacher and student. Final (or terminal) assessment is that which takes place only at the end of a learning activity. It is most appropriate when learning can only be assessed as a complete whole rather than as constituent parts. Typically, final assessment is used for summative decision-making.
4. Process vs. Product Assessment
Process assessment focuses on the steps or procedures underlying a particular ability or task, i.e., the cognitive steps in performing a mathematical operation. Because it provides more detailed information, process assessment is most useful when a student is learning a new skill and for providing formative feedback to assist in improving performance.
Product assessment focuses on evaluating the result or outcome of a process. Using the above example, we would focus on the answer to the math computation. Product assessment is most appropriate for documenting proficiency or competency in a given skill, i.e., for summative purposes.
5. Divergent vs. Convergent Assessment
Divergent assessments are those for which a range of answers or solutions might be considered correct. Divergent assessments tend to be more authentic and most appropriate in evaluating higher cognitive skills. However, these types of assessment are often time consuming to evaluate and the resulting judgments often exhibit poor reliability. A convergent assessment has only one correct response (per item). Objective test items are the best example and demonstrate the value of this approach in assessing knowledge. Obviously, convergent assessments are easier to evaluate or score than divergent assessments. Unfortunately, this “ease of use” often leads to their widespread application of this approach even when contrary to good assessment practices.
Assessment Principles
What principles will provide the most essential, fundamental "structure" of assessment knowledge and skills that result in effective educational practices and improved student learning? McMillan (2000) tries to elaborate the principles as follows:
What principles will provide the most essential, fundamental "structure" of assessment knowledge and skills that result in effective educational practices and improved student learning? McMillan (2000) tries to elaborate the principles as follows:
1. Assessment is inherently a process of professional judgment.
2. Assessment is based on separate but related principles of measurement evidence and evaluation.
3. Assessment decision-making is influenced by a series of tensions.
4. Assessment influences student motivation and learning.
5. Assessment contains error.
6. Good assessment enhances instruction.
7. Good assessment is valid.
8. Good assessment is fair and ethical.
9. Good assessments use multiple methods.
10. Good assessment is efficient and feasible.
11. Good assessment appropriately incorporates technology.
Testing: Why and How
Testing is certainly not the only way to assess students, but there are many good reasons for including a test in our language course:
1. A test can give the teacher valuable information about where the students are in their learning and can affect what the teacher will cover next. They will help a teacher to decide if her teaching has been effective and help to highlight what needs to be reviewed. Testing can be as much an assessment of the teaching as the learning
2. Tests can give students a sense of accomplishment as well as information about what they know and what they need to review.
3. Tests can also have a positive effect in that they encourage students to review material covered on the course.
However, sometimes testing doesn't work and we could find many arguments against using tests as a form of assessment:
1. Some students become so nervous that they can't perform and don't give a true account of their knowledge or ability
2. Other students can do well with last-minute cramming despite not having worked throughout the course
3. Once the test has finished, students can just forget all that they had learned
4. Students become focused on passing tests rather than learning to improve their language skills.
Frost (2004) admits that using only tests as a basis for assessment has obvious drawbacks. They are 'one-off' events that do not necessarily give an entirely fair account of a student's proficiency. As we have already mentioned, some people are more suited to them than others. There are other alternatives that can be used instead of or alongside tests.
1. Continuous assessment
Teachers give grades for a number of assignments over a period of time. A final grade is decided on a combination of assignments.
2. Portfolio
A student collects a number of assignments and projects and presents them in a file. The file is then used as a basis for evaluation.
3. Self-assessment
The students evaluate themselves. The criteria must be carefully decided upon beforehand.
4. Teacher's assessment
The teacher gives an assessment of the learner for work done throughout the course including classroom contributions.
To summarize, what is most essential about assessment is understanding how general, fundamental assessment principles and ideas can be used to enhance student learning and teacher effectiveness. This will be achieved as teachers and administrators learn about conceptual and technical assessment concepts, methods, and procedures, for both large-scale and classroom assessments, and apply these fundamentals to instruction. Finally, the comprehension on the assessment principles will guide the assessment training and professional development of teachers and administrators to run more productive assessment.
By Agustina Djihadi, found @ A Journey Called Life Blog
Monday, 3 November 2014
Sunday, 2 November 2014
Sunday, 7 September 2014
Some Back-to-School Magic!
![]() |
| image credits: New Class/ Ice Breakers |
Everyone loves a good icebreaker—it’s
a great way to get to know other people and help people feel relaxed in
stressful situations, such as the first day of a new school year.
Here are a
few icebreakers and some variations to the icebreakers to try during the first
week of school to build a good sense of community in your classroom that will last
throughout the year!
1 - Name
Chain Games
By far and
away the best way to learn and retain student names is to do a name chain game
to start off the class. You can vary the specifics to fit the needs of your
particular class, for example: the first student says 1) his or her name, 2)
his or her home country, 3) one interesting fact about himself or herself, and
4) his or her favorite English word. The next student must then repeat all of
the information about himself or herself and then say the name and favorite
English word of the preceding student. The third student introduces himself or
herself and then says the names and favorite English words of the preceding two
students, and so on until the last student.
2 - New
Year’s Resolutions
Your students
may be familiar with this popular tradition in January, but a new school year
should bring about new resolutions for students and teachers alike. Have students
partner up with each other and discuss what goals they have for themselves for
the school year. Encourage them to be specific with the things they would like
to accomplish and what they want to be different. Make sure that you as the
teacher make some resolutions too!
3 - Name That
Person
Another great
activity to get to your students to know each other a little better is a
guessing game. Pass out small pieces of paper or notecards to each student and
tell them to write down two facts about themselves on the card without writing
their name on them. Collect the cards in a basket and mix them up before
redistributing them to the students. Students take turn reading out the facts
from the note card and the other students guess which person wrote the card.
4 - Find
Objects to Describe Me...
A classic get
to know you activity is to have students go through their backpacks, folders,
pockets, etc... and find 3 or 4 things that they feel describe them very well.
Students then need to describe their objects and why they chose them as their
defining objects. Put students into pairs to share their objects or share as a
whole class so that way everyone can hear about their new classmates!
5 – I am cool
because…
If students
are getting sluggish and you need them to move around the first day, do this
activity. Have all of the students seated in a circle and you as a teacher
stand in the middle. To start off the activity, you will say “I’m cool
because...” and then finish that sentence with something that’s true about you,
for example, you’re wearing blue jeans, you speak 3 languages, etc... Then,
every student who shares that fact in common with you must stand up and find a
new seat. You also will need to find a seat meaning that one student will be
stranded in the middle. This game is great for finding commonalities and
getting in some good laughs!
Variation:
Play “I have never....” instead. When students are in the middle, have them
call out things they’ve never done and have the students move who have done
those activities.
6 - 3 Common,
1 Unique
This activity
is good for small groups. Randomly group students into three or four and give
them a time limit to discover three things that all members of the group have
in common and one thing that is unique for all of them. When the time is up,
have each group report to the class. Then, change up the groups and have them
do it again with their new class members. If it starts to get too easy, start
ruling out common answers like “We’re all from different countries” or “We all
breathe oxygen.”
Variation:
Try this with the whole class after doing it in small groups. If they’ve been
good listeners, they should be able to recall many things that all students had
in common. It may take awhile, but there are surely at least 3 things the whole
class has in common!
Source: Busy Teacher (slightly abridged)
Saturday, 6 September 2014
Reading online
![]() |
| image credits: Royalty Free Stock Images |
Research suggests that online reading
requires a different set of skills and strategies than offline reading. These different skills and strategies are
required because online reading is frequently information seeking, guided by
the reader (rather than the teacher) and non-linear (readers follow a series of
hyperlinks and navigate through multiple windows rather than reading something
from beginning to end). The skills
required for successful online reading are: the ability to formulate
appropriate questions, locate reliable information, and evaluate, synthesize
and communicate that information.
Additionally, because online reading
occurs within rapidly changing technology that may or may not be familiar to
teachers, and students are frequently engaged with outside of school, lessons
that build on students’ prior knowledge of these technologies can and should be
employed.
Finally,
research tells us that proficient offline readers are not always proficient
online readers and vice versa.
STRATEGIES
There are a
number of ways that you can help students formulate good questions:
- For younger
students, teach them to use appropriate search terms and quotations marks
rather than full questions when using a search engine.
- For older
students, teach them Boolean Operators (and, or, not, near, ( ), *) to better
refine their searches. Ask students to
perform a search before introducing Boolean Operators and then to perform the
same search after. Ask them to reflect on the different types of information
these searches find.
By asking
students to reflect on their already established online behavior, you can
engage in metacognitive reflection about their information seeking behavior and
what skills they need to develop:
- Have students
draw a map of their online reading behavior.
Start with a general research question and have them draw or take screen
shots of the various steps and detours they take to find the answer. Students can share their maps or screen shots
in class and reflect on the decisions they made at each point in their reading.
- As a class
you can use this as an opportunity to discuss how students assess the
reliability of websites, interact with their peers for advice during online
reading, and what problems they encountered and how they solved those problems.
In order to
help students learn to analyze and evaluate the information they encounter
online you can:
- Teach a
mini-lessons on the differences between .com, .gov, .org, and .edu domains.
- Design a
lesson that asks students to examine websites you select (be sure to provide
both reliable and unreliable sources). Elements for students to check for: can
the information presented be corroborated elsewhere? Is the writer of the
information reliable? Is the information current? Is the information
documented? Is the website advocating for something and therefore potentially challenged
as a neutral source? Is there a conflict of interest present?
- Have
students examine a famous website hoax (like the Yes Men spoof of a Dow
Chemical site that landed them interviews with the BBC
http://www.theyesmen.org/hijinks/dow) and search for clues that suggest it is a
hoax.
- Teach a
mini-lesson on propaganda techniques and have students identify the use of the
same techniques in online advertising.
Reflect with students on how the interactive medium of online reading
can increase or decrease the power of a particular propaganda technique.
Source: Read Write Think
Tuesday, 8 July 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




