Showing posts with label digital natives. Show all posts
Showing posts with label digital natives. Show all posts
Sunday, 27 January 2019
Rethink before you type by Trisha Prabhu
Wednesday, 3 October 2018
Friday, 13 April 2018
Saturday, 10 December 2016
Beware the 'digital native' stereotype
![]() |
| found image @ Academia Marketing Digital |
Mary Hertz cites a study in which the
nonprofit organization One Laptop Per Child left pre-loaded tablets with
illiterate children in remote Ethiopian villages. The children quickly figured
out how to use the applications and began teaching themselves to read. Within a
few months they'd overridden the software meant to freeze the desktop settings,
and customized their devices. But Hertz
says this proves her point that being able to use technology does not make you
proficient:
“Sure, we can place a tablet in the
hands of children who have never seen a package label or a sign, and they will
learn on their own. But what happens when and if those children become
connected to the larger, global online community? It is not guaranteed that
they will be ready to navigate etiquette and intellectual property rights on
their own. “
Instead, Hertz writes, we should
call students "digital citizens," which implies a more complicated
relationship with technology—not innate proficiency.
She is not the first to argue that
teachers cannot assume students know how to properly navigate the digital
world. Jody Passanisi and Shara Peters said in Scientific American that students struggle with basic Internet
searches, and a majority of teachers in a recent Pew Research Center survey
said students need more training in finding credible information online.
Perhaps
Hertz' claim boils down to semantics. Aren't 'digital natives' simply those who've only known a world in which
electronic devices are the primary means of accessing information? The term brings to mind this video.
Source: Education Week Teacher (slightly abridged and adapted)
Friday, 20 May 2016
Saturday, 30 November 2013
Critical & Creative Thinking
You are what you think. That's right.
Whatever you are doing right now, whatever you feel, whatever you want - all are
determined by the quality of your thinking. If your thinking is unrealistic,
your thinking will lead to many disappointments. If your thinking is overly
pessimistic, it will deny you due recognition of the many things in which you
should properly rejoice. For most people, most of their thinking is
subconscious, that is, never explicitly put into words. The problem is that
when you are not aware of your thinking you have no chance of “correcting” it.
When thinking is subconscious, you are in no position to see any problems in
it. And, if you don't see any problems in it, you won't be motivated to change
it.
When we are thinking of a classroom context, critical thinking is thinking that assesses itself. To the extent that our students need us to tell
them how well they are doing, they are not thinking critically. Didactic
instruction makes students overly dependent on the teacher. In such
instruction, students rarely develop any perceptible intellectual independence
and typically have no intellectual standards to assess their thinking with.
Instruction that fosters a disciplined, thinking mind, on the other hand, is
180 degrees in the opposite direction.
Each step in the process of thinking
critically is tied to a self-reflexive step of self-assessment. As a critical
thinker, I do not simply state the problem; I state it and assess it for its
clarity. I do not simply gather information; I gather it and check it for its
relevance and significance. I do not simply form an interpretation; I check my
interpretation to see what it is based on and whether that basis is adequate.
Because of the importance of
self-assessment to critical thinking, it is important to bring it into the
structural design of the class and not just leave it to episodic tactics.
Virtually every day, for example, students should be giving (to their pairs)
and receiving feedback on the quality of their work. They
should be regularly using intellectual standards in an explicit way.
The following wheel shows a procedure sequence that will allow you to engage your students in thinking critically:
![]() |
| Credits: somasimple |
The following verb wheel shows a whole set of activities we can get our students to do in class, based on Bloom's Taxonomy:
![]() |
| Credits: critical & creative thinking |
Wednesday, 11 July 2012
Social Networking in ELT
Advantages of Social Networking
Now more than ever before the role of social media in education is under discussion. Advocates point out the benefits that social media provides for today's digital learners while critics call for regulation. Finding a middle ground has become a challenge. As an educational tool, social media enriches the learning experience by allowing students and teachers to connect and interact in new, exciting ways. Websites such as Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn provide a platform where users can dialog, exchange ideas, and find answers to questions. These sites are designed to foster collaboration and discussion. Despite these benefits, critics argue that there are serious risks to using social media in the classroom. The main issue is: do these risks outweigh the potential for opportunity?
![]() |
| found pic @ ATL&S |
- Educational tool:
most students nowadays are fluent in Web and social networking
technologies. Teachers must leverage this knowledge to enrich the learning
experience. With social media, educators can foster collaboration and
discussion, create meaningful dialogue, exchange ideas, and boost student
interaction, especially when they are moving inside a new linguistic code.
- Enhance student engagement: students who rarely
participate in class may feel more comfortable expressing themselves on
Facebook, Twitter, or YouTube. Social networking platforms enable teachers to
establish “back channels” that foster discussion and surface ideas that
students are too shy or intimidated to express themselves.
- Improve communication between students and teachers: Facebook
and Twitter can enhance communication between students and teachers. Educators
can answer students’ questions, post homework assignments or lesson plans, send
messages and updates, schedule or announce upcoming events, and share
interesting Web sites or multimedia content. Students can use Twitter to get
help from instructors or other students. A great way for instructors to give
participation points in addition to in class participation is by having
students tweet about something that was discussed in class.
- Preparing students for active life: students entering the
workforce can use social networking sites to network and find employment. With
LinkedIn, students can establish a professional Web presence, post a resume,
research a target company or school, and connect with other job seekers and
employers. Students should follow professional organizations on Facebook and
Twitter to be updated on new opportunities.
Disadvantages of Social Networking
- Social Media can be a distraction: tools like Facebook and
Twitter may actually divert students' attention away from what's happening in
class and may be disruptive to the learning process.
- Cyberbullying: While social networking sites provide a way
for students and teachers to connect, they can be a weapon of malicious
behavior. Teachers who use social networking tools as part of their activities
must be aware of potential dangers and plan to intervene on minor incidents
before they become more serious.
- Discouraging presencial communication: while real-time
digital stream may create a safe harbour for students who are uncomfortable
expressing themselves, students are missing valuable lessons in real-life
social skills.
Now more than ever before the role of social media in education is under discussion. Advocates point out the benefits that social media provides for today's digital learners while critics call for regulation. Finding a middle ground has become a challenge. As an educational tool, social media enriches the learning experience by allowing students and teachers to connect and interact in new, exciting ways. Websites such as Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn provide a platform where users can dialog, exchange ideas, and find answers to questions. These sites are designed to foster collaboration and discussion. Despite these benefits, critics argue that there are serious risks to using social media in the classroom. The main issue is: do these risks outweigh the potential for opportunity?
While the discussion goes on about the pros and cons of
social networking in ELT, no one can argue the influence ICT has on our
students. This new-millenium generation conducts much of their life through
social media. They are already using YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter as tools
for learning. They expect their schools and their teachers do it, too! Let's
not forget that a new reality should be faced with a whole new attitude.
Tuesday, 26 June 2012
New Learning Paradigms
![]() |
| found pic @ Educadores Inovadores FB page |
The New Millennium Learners (individuals born in the early 1980s or later) grew up surrounded by digital
media and that implies significantly different
learning styles from previous generations. Several
terms have been used to describe this generation
of learners: “Digital Natives”, “Net Generation” or “New Millennium
Learners”. They
have also been dubbed the Homo Zappiens, for their ability
to control different sources of digital information
simultaneously.
Not all people born after the early 1980s
display the “typical” properties of NML (while
some individuals born before do) and there are
profound discrepancies between different countries and within different countries,
reflecting prevailing digital divides.
Compared to previous generations of learners, they are digitally literate, they think more visually and in a non-linear manner, they practise multitasking and give preference to multimedia environments. They are continuously connected with their peers and “always on”. In learning environments they are easily bored, need a variety of stimuli not to get distracted and expect instant feedback.
To come to terms with the information overload of the digital era, they need to employ learning strategies that involve searching, managing, re-combining, validating and contextualising information.
According to various studies on the use of digital communication technologies among university students confirm that the generation of NML can be characterised as:
(i) connected and mobile;
(ii) skilled at multitasking;
(iii) social and interactive;(iv) results oriented.
To cope with the abundance of information available, students have to develop new skills to "survive" in the knowledge and digital society:
i) stay focused in important tasks;
ii) connect with each other to be informed;
iii) think creatively and critically.
These are the reasons why the teacher of this new digital era must explore new tools in the educational context, bearing in mind the digital literacy and e-strategies. The whole educational process is now student-centred, giving learners the necessary critical thinking ablity to overcome the danger of globalization and manipulation.
It is crucial to stimulate curiosity and enthusiam, so that students can be full digital citizens. With this change in learning and teaching paradigms, the role of the teacher must be to incentivate learning and thinking and to promote collective intelligence production. The information flood won't stop, so we will have to teach our students to "swim" or even better to "navigate".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




